This course, ARCHPRM703, is less about architecture and more about architects, architecting.It is not about 'what architects do' (design as product) but 'how architects do it' (design as process / practice).The course examines how architectural practice arises, appears and manifests across national borders and what happens when architects operate in foreign fields. What is it like to practice at home versus away?
In a recent issue of the RIBA Journal (Jul/Aug 2024), British architects were increasingly getting more fees for architectural services provided outside the UK. How might the pressures and unpredictability of practice as a game of survival, of getting work, influence the architectural business model and project procurement? Furthermore, due to the increasing mobility of transnational practice, our cities are becoming less contextual and more global generic. The 'same ' retail chains (Aldi, Tescos, H&M...) are present in London, Los Angeles and Sydney. A continuous flow of design information is propelling architecture as media, and fuelling the spectacularisation of a convergent universal architecture. So how important is culture and context to contemporary practice?
In S,M,L,XL Rem Koolhaas provocatively wrote in relation to bigness: "With scale, with architectural composition, with tradition, with transparency, with ethics - imply the final, most radical break: Bigness is no longer part of any urban tissue. It exists; at most, it coexists. Its subtext is f*ck context. Past a certain scale, buildings become big buildings. Big buildings have unique characteristics enabled by certain conditions (no longer controllable by one architectural gesture, buildings with Bigness have autonomous parts; the elevator, which nullifies scale; the façade can no longer reflect the interior, as the distance between the exterior and interior is too large; the scale makes buildings amoral, as they are beyond judgement; f*ck context." Context has become meaningless, an architectural pretence to ground space to a place.
Using problem-based learning and case studies from the indigenous to the international, this course immerses the student in the role of the transnational Architect. This course relocates you to a foreign context. In 2024, that 'strange place' was Japan. In 2025, it could be Miami, home of the 2025 World Architecture Festival (WAF), and the world's jamboree of architectural practice pumped as transnationalism. As a WAF judge, I assessed Russian architects practising in Saudi Arabia (Creative Cluster Riyadh x IND), Norwegian architects practising in China (Wuhan Opera Centre x PES Architects)... and witnessed BIG practising in Bhutan. So how do we reconcile culture and context? Indeed, has content replaced context?