Attendance is required at scheduled labs to complete components of the course.

Lectures will be available as recordings.

The activities for the course are scheduled as a standard weekly timetable.

Taught courses use a learning and collaboration tool called Canvas to provide students with learning materials including reading lists and lecture recordings (where available). Please remember that the recording of any class on a personal device requires the permission of the instructor.

The content and delivery of content in this course are protected by copyright. Material belonging to others may have been used in this course and copied by and solely for the educational purposes of the University under license. You may copy the course content for the purposes of private study or research, but you may not upload onto any third-party site, make a further copy or sell, alter or further reproduce or distribute any part of the course content to another person.

In the event of an unexpected disruption, we undertake to maintain the continuity and standard of teaching and learning in all your courses throughout the year. If there are unexpected disruptions the University has contingency plans to ensure that access to your course continues and course assessment continues to meet the principles of the University’s assessment policy. Some adjustments may need to be made in emergencies. You will be kept fully informed by your course co-ordinator/director, and if disruption occurs you should refer to the university website for information about how to proceed.

The University of Auckland will not tolerate cheating, or assisting others to cheat, and views cheating in coursework as a serious academic offence. The work that a student submits for grading must be the student's own work, reflecting their learning. Where work from other sources is used, it must be properly acknowledged and referenced. This requirement also applies to sources on the internet. A student's assessed work may be reviewed for potential plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct, using computerised detection mechanisms.

Similarly, research students must meet the University’s expectations of good research practice. This requires:

• Honesty - in all aspects of research work
• Accountability - in the conduct of research
• Professional courtesy and fairness – in working with others
• Good stewardship – on behalf of others
• Transparency – of research process and presentation of results
• Clarity - communication to be understandable, explainable and accessible

For more information on the University’s expectations of academic integrity, please see the Academic Conduct section of the University policy hub.

Elements of this outline may be subject to change. The latest information about taught courses is made available to enrolled students in Canvas.

Students may be asked to submit assessments digitally. The University reserves the right to conduct scheduled tests and examinations online or through the use of computers or other electronic devices. Where tests or examinations are conducted online remote invigilation arrangements may be used. In exceptional circumstances changes to elements of this course may be necessary at short notice. Students enrolled in this course will be informed of any such changes and the reasons for them, as soon as possible, through Canvas.

Students must pass the coursework component as well as the exam, to pass the course.

Feedback on taught courses is gathered from students at the end of each semester through a tool called SET or Qualtrics. The lecturers and course co-ordinators will consider all feedback and respond with summaries and actions. Your feedback helps teachers to improve the course and its delivery for future students. In addition, class Representatives in each class can take feedback to the department and faculty staff-student consultative committees.

Reflection of 2025:

Here’s what students said they liked about the course:

• Organisation and layout of the Canvas course page
• Clear labelling of content, early upload of lecture slides, and accessible recordings
• Engaging, clear, and well-structured teaching quality
• Well-designed slides, logical flow of content, and integrations of lab tutorials with PBLs 
• Clear communication and responsiveness from teaching staff

Here’s what students said they found challenging:

• Amount of content and level of detail overwhelming for 15-point course
• Some lectures (Alyssa's) included more detail than others, and not all details were on slides, making prioritisation for studying difficult
• Lab quizzes were seen as ambiguous and reliant on subjective interpretation, with insufficient alignment with lecture or lab tutorial material
• Lack of feedback after quizzes made it difficult to learn from mistakes
• PBL sessions were a bit disengaging for students who were not presenting

Based on the feedback, these are the changes we will make for the next delivery of the course:

• RE: Content volume and delivery: We will endeavour to better align workload with credit value, and provide additional support to manage content load (e.g. introducing more lecture pre-readings, introduce lecture post-reading/revision activities to help reinforce key learning objectives). I (Alyssa) will also make a note to mention when details in the lecture are to aid with learning concepts/for 'funducational' purposes (although students can always refer back to learning objectives when it comes to preparing for assessments).
• RE: Lab MCQ quizzes: We will reduce the weighting of these quizzes and base the MCQs off the lab tutorials instead of the PBLs going forward, so that it will be directly aligned with the delivered material. The correct answers will also be provided upon completion of the quizzes to provide feedback, and we will make the quizzes available to retake multiple times with no limits so students may use this as a form of study/revision if they wish.
• RE: Lab PBLs: We will change these PBLs to be in a 'debate'-style format (similar to how PBLs are run in OPTOM 216). Presenting teams will defend the diagnosis they have been provided for the PBL case, while students in the audience will be tasked with challenging the presenting teams. We will also include a class vote for a winning diagnosis for every PBL case. The rubric of these PBLs will be amended to include extra weightage to account for the new challenging and voting components.

Class representatives are students tasked with representing student issues to departments, faculties, and the wider university. If you have a complaint about this course, please contact your class rep who will know how to raise it in the right channels. See your departmental noticeboard for contact details for your class reps.

Tuākana is a multi-faceted programme for Māori and Pacific students providing topic specific tutorials, one-on-one sessions, test and exam preparation and more. Explore your options at Tuakana Learning Communities.

All students are asked to discuss any impairment related requirements privately, face to face and/or in written form with the course coordinator, lecturer or tutor. Student Disability Services also provides support for students with a wide range of impairments, both visible and invisible, to succeed and excel at the University. For more information and contact details, please visit the Student Disability Services’ website.

We all go through tough times during the semester, or see our friends struggling. There is lots of help out there - please see the Support Services page for information on support services in the University and the wider community.

If your ability to complete assessed work is affected by illness or other personal circumstances outside of your control, contact a member of teaching staff as soon as possible before the assessment is due. If your personal circumstances significantly affect your performance, or preparation, for an exam or eligible written test, refer to the University’s aegrotat or compassionate consideration page. This should be done as soon as possible and no later than seven days after the affected test or exam date.

The Student Charter assumes and acknowledges that students are active participants in the learning process and that they have responsibilities to the institution and the international community of scholars. The University expects that students will act at all times in a way that demonstrates respect for the rights of other students and staff so that the learning environment is both safe and productive. For further information visit Student Charter.

Students with concerns about teaching including how a course is delivered, the resources provided, or supervision arrangements, have the right to express their concerns and seek resolution. The university encourages informal resolution where possible, as this is quicker and less stressful. For information on the informal and formal complaints processes, please refer to the Student Academic Complaints Statute in the Student Policies and Guidelines section of the Policy Hub.